Can Richmar EMG Pro Be Used for Pelvic Floor Neuromuscular Re-Education After HoLEP Surgery?
For a man who needs clinician-directed pelvic-floor neuromuscular re-education after HoLEP surgery, the Richmar EMG Pro with probes is a substantially better equipment match than a general-purpose surface NMES unit.
Why?
Because post-prostate pelvic-floor rehabilitation often involves more than simply making a muscle contract.
The clinician may need to determine:
- Is the patient actually recruiting the pelvic floor?
- How strong is the voluntary EMG signal?
- Can the patient sustain a contraction?
- Can the patient relax fully afterward?
- Is recruitment improving over repeated sessions?
- Would biofeedback alone be sufficient?
- Would stimulation help a weak contraction?
- Could stimulation be triggered only after the patient initiates an appropriate voluntary contraction?
The Richmar EMG Pro was designed around exactly this type of measurement + feedback + stimulation workflow.
Richmar describes EMG Pro as a prescription rehabilitation system combining:
- EMG biofeedback
- EMG-triggered stimulation (ETS)
- NMES
- TENS
- real-time visual and auditory muscle feedback
- preset and customizable rehabilitation programs
- 17 incontinence protocols
- Therapist and patient operating modes
- optional vaginal and rectal pelvic-floor probes
and specifically lists urinary incontinence and pelvic-floor health among its applications.
For male pelvic-floor rehabilitation, the relevant configuration is the EMG Pro with probes, which supports Richmar’s rectal probe for appropriate clinician-directed incontinence protocols.
Quick Answer: Is EMG Pro Appropriate After HoLEP?
Potentially, yes—when prescribed and supervised by the urologist and a trained pelvic-health clinician.
The important limitation is that Richmar EMG Pro itself has not been specifically proven in a HoLEP clinical trial.
What the evidence does support is
- Pelvic-floor muscle training after HoLEP has direct randomized clinical evidence.
- Biofeedback and electrical stimulation are established tools in male post-prostate-surgery continence rehabilitation more broadly.
- Richmar EMG Pro is specifically designed for pelvic-floor and urinary-incontinence workflows and provides a rectal probe, EMG biofeedback, ETS, and NMES in one system.
EMG Pro is a well-matched professional rehabilitation platform when a clinician decides that pelvic-floor biofeedback, EMG-triggered stimulation or NMES should be added to active pelvic-floor training after HoLEP. It should not be marketed as a proven standalone treatment or cure for post-HoLEP incontinence.
Why Pelvic-Floor Rehabilitation May Be Needed After HoLEP
HoLEP—holmium laser enucleation of the prostate—is performed to relieve bladder-outlet obstruction caused by benign prostate enlargement.
Temporary urinary leakage can occur during recovery.
Continence depends on coordinated function among the:
- external urethral sphincter;
- pelvic-floor muscles;
- bladder;
- urethra;
- nervous system; and
- abdominal pressure-control system.
That makes rehabilitation more sophisticated than simply telling every patient to perform more Kegel exercises.
A pelvic-health clinician may need to retrain:
- muscle identification;
- voluntary recruitment;
- contraction strength;
- endurance;
- rapid contractions;
- relaxation;
- coordination with coughing;
- coordination during standing or lifting; and
- anticipatory pelvic-floor activation.
EMG biofeedback can make that otherwise invisible muscle activity visible to the patient and clinician.
What Does the HoLEP Evidence Show?
Pelvic-floor muscle exercise has direct clinical evidence after HoLEP.
A randomized study of 70 men undergoing HoLEP compared patients who began pelvic-floor muscle exercises before surgery and continued afterward with men who began the exercises only postoperatively.
At three months, urinary incontinence occurred in:
3% of the preoperative-training group
versus
26% of the postoperative-only group.
By six months, continence recovery was high in both groups, and the difference was no longer significant.
That suggests pelvic-floor training may be especially valuable for accelerating early continence recovery.
The study did not evaluate Richmar EMG Pro.
Therefore the evidence supports:
pelvic-floor rehabilitation after HoLEP
rather than:
a claim that one specific electronic device has been proven to restore continence after HoLEP.
Why EMG Pro Is a Better Fit Than a Basic NMES Unit
The key advantage is that EMG Pro can help determine whether the patient is actively learning to control the pelvic floor, rather than merely receiving stimulation.
EMG Pro combines four different tools.
| EMG Pro mode | What it does | Why it can matter in pelvic-floor rehabilitation |
|---|---|---|
| EMG Biofeedback | Measures voluntary muscle activity | Helps the patient learn whether the correct contraction is occurring |
| ETS | Patient contraction triggers stimulation after reaching a programmed threshold. | Encourages active effort before electrical assistance |
| NMES | Electrically produces/assists muscular contraction | May supplement weak voluntary recruitment when clinically appropriate |
| TENS | Sensory electrical stimulation | Different modality; not the primary continence-retraining feature |
Richmar specifically identifies muscle re-education, urinary incontinence, and pelvic-floor health within EMG Pro’s intended rehabilitation applications.
Why EMG Biofeedback May Be Particularly Useful After Prostate Surgery
The pelvic floor is difficult for patients to see and feel objectively.
A man may believe he is performing a strong pelvic-floor contraction while actually recruiting primarily:
- abdominal muscles;
- gluteals;
- adductors;
- breath-holding strategies; or
- another accessory muscle pattern.
EMG biofeedback provides another layer of information.
A contracting skeletal muscle produces electrical activity as motor units are recruited. EMG Pro measures that activity and provides visual and auditory feedback to the patient.
The patient can therefore practice:
contract → observe feedback → hold → relax → observe signal decrease → repeat
rather than relying only on subjective sensation.
What Can EMG Biofeedback Tell the Clinician?
| EMG observation | Possible rehabilitation meaning |
|---|---|
| Signal rises when contraction is attempted. | Voluntary recruitment is occurring. |
| The signal remains very low. | Contraction technique or muscle recruitment may need reassessment. |
| The signal rises but cannot be maintained. | Endurance may require training. |
| Signal remains elevated during intended relaxation. | Relaxation or coordination may need work. |
| Contractions become progressively more consistent. | Motor control may be improving. |
| The patient repeatedly reaches the training threshold. | The program may be ready to progress. |
| The patient cannot reach the threshold despite correct effort. | ETS or another intervention may be considered |
EMG amplitude should not be interpreted as a direct measurement of muscle force.
The clinician evaluates it together with the patient's symptoms, examination, and continence performance.
Read our Pelvic Floor EMG Biofeedback Guide.
What Is EMG-Triggered Stimulation, or ETS?
ETS is one of the biggest reasons EMG Pro is more compelling for this application than a conventional NMES device.
With traditional NMES:
The stimulator produces the contraction.
With EMG-triggered stimulation:
The patient first attempts the contraction.
EMG Pro monitors that voluntary effort.
Once the patient reaches a clinician-selected EMG threshold:
Electrical stimulation is triggered to reinforce or assist the contraction.
The sequence is
- Patient attempts to contract the pelvic floor.
- EMG Pro measures the muscle signal.
- Patient sees or hears the feedback.
- Signal reaches the programmed threshold.
- Electrical stimulation activates.
- Patient experiences assisted recruitment linked to his own voluntary effort.
- The cycle is repeated as part of motor retraining.
This is conceptually different from passive stimulation because the patient remains an active participant.
Richmar specifically provides ETS as one of EMG Pro’s four operating modes.
Why ETS May Make Sense for Neuromuscular Re-Education
The rehabilitation goal after prostate surgery is generally not simply:
“Make the pelvic floor contract electrically.”
It is:
“Help the patient regain reliable voluntary control of the continence musculature during everyday activities.”
ETS can bridge those goals.
The patient has to initiate the contraction before assistance is delivered.
That may help reinforce the relationship between:
- intention;
- muscle recruitment;
- sensory feedback; and
- successful contraction.
It should still be incorporated into a comprehensive pelvic-floor rehabilitation plan rather than used as a substitute for active exercise.
Why the Rectal Probe Matters for Male Pelvic-Floor Therapy
Pelvic-floor musculature is anatomically deep.
A general surface NMES unit relies on skin electrodes placed externally.
EMG Pro's probe-equipped configuration supports a rectal probe specifically designed for applicable pelvic-floor and incontinence protocols. Richmar lists the EMG-RP rectal probe as an optional accessory and offers the DQEMGP EMG Pro with probe configuration.
The probe can provide a more direct pelvic-floor interface for:
- EMG measurement;
- biofeedback;
- appropriate electrical stimulation; and
- clinician-guided muscle retraining.
That makes it substantially more relevant to male pelvic-floor rehabilitation than simply placing general-purpose adhesive electrodes somewhere around the pelvis.
Which EMG Pro Configuration Is the Better Choice?
For this specific use, the answer is
Richmar EMG Pro With Probes — DQEMGP
Balego currently offers two configurations:
| Configuration | Best fit |
|---|---|
| EMG Pro With Electrodes — DQEMG | Orthopedic, sports, neurological, and general surface-muscle rehabilitation |
| EMG Pro With Probes — DQEMGP | Pelvic-floor and incontinence workflows requiring vaginal or rectal probe capability |
For a male post-HoLEP pelvic-floor program in which internal biofeedback or stimulation has been prescribed, DQEMGP is the more appropriate configuration.
Compare EMG Pro configurations.
Richmar EMG Pro vs. Balego NMES After HoLEP
The BAL805 remains a useful general-purpose NMES device.
But for this specific question, EMG Pro has the stronger clinical fit.
| Feature | Richmar EMG Pro With Probes | Balego NMES |
|---|---|---|
| NMES | Yes. | Yes. |
| EMG biofeedback | Yes. | No |
| Visual muscle feedback | Yes. | No |
| Auditory feedback | Yes. | No |
| EMG-triggered stimulation | Yes. | No |
| Rectal probe capability | Yes. | Not established |
| Pelvic-floor workflow | Yes. | General surface NMES |
| Urinary-incontinence protocols | 17 manufacturer-listed protocols | No dedicated continence protocols identified |
| Therapist programming | Yes. | Adjustable NMES controls |
| Patient Mode | Yes. | No equivalent EMG-guided workflow |
| Stored assessment/training data | Yes. | No |
| Best use in this context | Specialized clinician-directed pelvic-floor re-education | General surface muscle stimulation |
Richmar expressly positions EMG Pro for pelvic-floor health and urinary incontinence. The BAL805 is designed around conventional external surface NMES.
That makes EMG Pro the more defensible Balego recommendation.
View the Balego BAL805 for general NMES applications.
Why Not Just Put BAL805 Pads on the Perineum?
Surface perineal electrical stimulation is a legitimate rehabilitation technique and has been studied in men after prostate surgery.
But that does not mean every general NMES device and electrode placement automatically reproduces those protocols.
A specialized pelvic-floor system provides benefits that ordinary surface stimulation does not:
- direct pelvic-floor EMG measurement;
- objective feedback;
- threshold training;
- internal probe capability;
- incontinence-specific programs; and
- EMG-triggered stimulation.
For a clinician who simply needs conventional surface NMES for another muscle group, BAL805 remains appropriate.
For a clinician trying to evaluate and retrain male pelvic-floor recruitment, EMG Pro offers much more relevant functionality.
Pelvic-Floor Training Should Still Be the Foundation
Neither biofeedback nor NMES replaces active pelvic-floor muscle training.
Current European urologic guidance describes pelvic-floor muscle training as part of conservative management of male post-surgical urinary incontinence and notes that biofeedback and electrical stimulation may be added in selected cases. The evidence for the incremental benefit of stimulation remains mixed, and recommendations are correspondingly cautious.
For HoLEP specifically, the direct randomized evidence supports pelvic-floor muscle exercise.
Therefore, the preferred rehabilitation model is
Active pelvic-floor training first, with EMG biofeedback, ETS and/or NMES added when assessment shows that these tools can improve muscle identification, recruitment or progression.
HoLEP Evidence vs. Radical-Prostatectomy Evidence
This page should not blur the two surgeries.
HoLEP
Performed primarily for benign prostatic obstruction.
Direct evidence exists for pelvic-floor muscle exercise improving early continence recovery.
Radical prostatectomy
Performed primarily for prostate cancer.
Most of the published male continence literature involves:
- EMG biofeedback;
- pelvic-floor electrical stimulation;
- internal probes; and
- combined device-assisted rehabilitation
comes from this population.
European guidance notes that pelvic-floor muscle training alone or combined with biofeedback/electrostimulation may accelerate continence recovery after radical prostatectomy, while acknowledging conflicting evidence about the added contribution of the devices themselves.
What that means for EMG Pro after HoLEP
It is reasonable to identify EMG Pro as a clinically appropriate technology platform when a trained clinician decides that biofeedback or stimulation is indicated.
It would be inappropriate to say:
“Clinical trials prove EMG Pro treats incontinence after HoLEP.”
No such device-specific HoLEP evidence was identified.
What About Surface vs. Rectal-Probe Rehabilitation?
Both approaches exist in male pelvic-floor rehabilitation.
| Approach | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| External surface electrodes | Noninvasive, simpler setup | Less direct pelvic-floor interface |
| Rectal EMG probe | More direct pelvic-floor signal acquisition | Internal device; requires screening and training |
| Rectal stimulation probe | Direct pelvic-floor stimulation when indicated | More invasive; must use compatible device and protocol |
| Biofeedback only | Teaches active voluntary recruitment | Does not electrically produce contraction |
| NMES only | Can assist muscle activation | Does not measure whether voluntary control improves |
| ETS | Links voluntary effort to stimulation | Requires clinician programming and correct EMG setup |
The EMG Pro supports multiple approaches within the same rehabilitation platform.
Who Should Decide Whether a Rectal Probe Is Appropriate?
The clinician.
An internal probe should not be selected merely because:
- urinary leakage is present;
- The device includes one;
- external exercises are frustrating; or
- The patient wants faster results.
The clinician should consider:
- surgical status;
- catheter removal;
- healing;
- bleeding;
- pain;
- infection risk;
- rectal conditions;
- sensation;
- implanted medical devices;
- neurologic status;
- type of urinary incontinence; and
- all manufacturer contraindications and precautions.
EMG Pro is an Rx-only professional rehabilitation device.
When Can EMG Pro Be Started After HoLEP?
There is no universal postoperative day on which every man should begin internal biofeedback or electrical stimulation.
The surgeon needs to determine when postoperative healing is sufficient.
Pelvic-floor exercise and internal probe-based intervention are not necessarily started on the same schedule.
Do not assume that because a patient has been cleared to perform voluntary pelvic-floor contractions, he has automatically been cleared for:
- rectal probe insertion;
- electrical stimulation;
- EMG-triggered stimulation; or
- unsupervised home treatment.
The operating urologist and pelvic-health clinician should coordinate timing.
Why EMG Pro's Therapist and Patient Modes Matter
One of EMG Pro’s useful features is its ability to support a clinic-to-home workflow.
Balego's current product information describes both:
Therapist Mode
Allows the clinician to access programming and treatment parameters.
Patient Mode
Allows a clinician-established program to be used with functions restricted or locked for home carryover.
That is more appropriate for specialized pelvic-floor rehabilitation than sending a patient home with an unrestricted general stimulator and asking him to reproduce a protocol from memory.
The clinician can establish the program first, train the patient, and then determine whether home continuation is appropriate.
EMG Pro's 17 Incontinence Protocols: What Do They Mean?
Richmar states that EMG Pro includes 17 incontinence protocols.
This is important because it shows the system was deliberately developed around continence rehabilitation rather than adapting an orthopedic stimulator after the fact.
However:
17 protocols does not mean every protocol is appropriate after HoLEP.
Protocol selection still depends on:
- whether leakage is stress-, urgency-, or mixed-pattern;
- voluntary pelvic-floor performance;
- treatment stage;
- surgical clearance;
- patient tolerance; and
- clinician assessment.
The clinician should use the device manual and examination findings rather than selecting a preset solely from a diagnosis label.
What Kind of Post-HoLEP Patient Might Benefit Most From Biofeedback?
EMG biofeedback may be especially useful when the patient:
- cannot tell whether he is contracting the correct muscles;
- repeatedly substitutes abdominal or gluteal muscles;
- has difficulty sustaining a contraction;
- cannot relax completely between contractions;
- lacks confidence in his exercise technique;
- needs an objective training target;
- requires progression beyond verbal instructions; or
- would benefit from visual confirmation of improvement.
Biofeedback is therefore as much a learning tool as it is a measurement technology.
When Might ETS or NMES Be Added?
A pelvic-health clinician may consider electrical assistance when:
- Voluntary recruitment is very weak;
- the patient understands the task but cannot produce sufficient contraction;
- A stronger sensory cue would help motor learning;
- the clinician wants to pair voluntary effort with assisted activation; or
- The patient has reached a plateau with exercise and biofeedback alone.
ETS can be particularly attractive because it requires voluntary effort before stimulation is triggered.
This helps preserve the principle that rehabilitation should build active control rather than passive dependence on stimulation.
Stress Leakage vs. Urgency After HoLEP
Not every urinary symptom after HoLEP represents the same pelvic-floor problem.
| Pattern | Typical description | Rehabilitation implications |
|---|---|---|
| Stress leakage | Leakage with coughing, standing, lifting, or movement | Strength, timing, and anticipatory contraction may be important. |
| Urgency leakage | Strong sudden urge followed by leakage | Bladder training and urge-control strategies may be important. |
| Mixed pattern | Both stress and urgency symptoms | A combined program may be needed. |
| Continuous leakage | Ongoing loss unrelated to activity/urge | Requires medical reassessment |
| Retention/poor emptying | Weak stream or inability to empty | Urologic evaluation rather than simply more NMES |
| Pain, fever, or worsening hematuria | Possible complication | Medical evaluation |
EMG Pro includes continence-related protocols, but the device cannot replace diagnosis.
Why EMG Pro Is Better Positioned for Neuromuscular Re-Education
“Neuromuscular re-education” means improving the relationship between the nervous system and muscle performance.
For pelvic-floor rehabilitation, that can include:
- awareness;
- recruitment;
- timing;
- endurance;
- relaxation;
- coordination;
- graded effort; and
- functional activation.
A generic NMES device addresses mainly:
electrical muscle recruitment.
EMG Pro can address:
measurement → feedback → voluntary effort → threshold → stimulation → reassessment.
That more closely matches the clinical meaning of neuromuscular re-education.
Richmar EMG Pro vs. Kegel Exercises
It should not be framed as either/or.
| Pelvic-floor exercise alone | EMG pro-assisted rehabilitation |
|---|---|
| The patient performs voluntary contractions. | The patient still performs voluntary contractions. |
| Technique judged by sensation/clinician exam | EMG adds objective real-time feedback. |
| No electrical assistance | NMES can be added when indicated. |
| No threshold trigger | ETS can reinforce successful voluntary recruitment. |
| Low equipment burden | Requires Rx device and clinician training |
| Appropriate for many patients | Useful when additional feedback/assistance is needed |
The direct HoLEP evidence supports pelvic-floor exercise. EMG Pro can be positioned as a professional adjunct when exercises alone need additional measurement, cueing, or assistance.
Is the Richmar EMG Pro a Home Device?
It can support clinician-directed home use, but it is not an ordinary over-the-counter Kegel gadget.
Richmar lists EMG Pro as Rx only.
The system is intended to allow trained clinicians to:
- evaluate;
- program;
- teach;
- monitor; and
- When appropriate, transition selected treatment to Patient Mode.
Internal rectal-probe use also requires correct:
- insertion;
- placement;
- hygiene;
- cleaning;
- contraindication screening; and
- stimulation settings.
The manufacturer manual should govern these details rather than an online blog.
Is EMG Pro Proven to Cure Post-HoLEP Incontinence?
No.
That claim would go beyond the evidence.
The correct evidence-based positioning is
Established directly after HoLEP
Pelvic-floor muscle exercise can accelerate early continence recovery.
Supported more broadly after prostate surgery
Pelvic-floor training may be combined with biofeedback and/or electrical stimulation in selected men, though evidence about the additional benefit remains mixed.
Richmar EMG Pro
A professional device specifically designed to provide pelvic-floor EMG biofeedback, ETS, NMES, and incontinence protocols—including rectal-probe capability—but not specifically validated in a HoLEP randomized trial.
That distinction makes the recommendation both useful and defensible.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Richmar EMG Pro better than the BAL805 for pelvic-floor rehabilitation after HoLEP?
Yes, for this specialized purpose.
EMG Pro adds pelvic-floor EMG biofeedback, ETS, dedicated incontinence programs, and rectal-probe capability. BAL805 is a general-purpose surface NMES unit.
Which EMG Pro model should be used for male pelvic-floor therapy?
When a clinician needs a rectal probe for appropriate male incontinence treatment, the relevant configuration is EMG Pro With Probes, DQEMGP.
Does EMG Pro include a rectal probe?
Richmar lists the EMG-RP rectal probe as the compatible rectal probe and offers the EMG Pro with probe configuration.
Does EMG Pro have urinary-incontinence programs?
Yes.
Richmar states that EMG Pro includes 17 incontinence protocols.
Does EMG Pro measure pelvic-floor contractions?
In appropriate EMG/probe configurations, EMG biofeedback measures the electrical activity associated with pelvic-floor muscle recruitment and provides visual and auditory feedback.
It does not directly measure mechanical muscle force.
Can it stimulate the pelvic floor too?
Yes, EMG Pro includes NMES and EMG-triggered stimulation in addition to EMG biofeedback.
What is the advantage of EMG-triggered stimulation?
ETS requires the patient to initiate a voluntary contraction and reach a programmed EMG threshold before stimulation begins.
That links active effort to electrical assistance.
Is pelvic-floor exercise effective after HoLEP?
A randomized trial found that pelvic-floor muscle exercise started before HoLEP and continued afterward was associated with faster early continence recovery, including a significant difference at three months.
Has EMG Pro itself been studied after HoLEP?
No EMG Pro-specific HoLEP clinical trial was identified in this review.
The recommendation is based on its manufacturer-defined pelvic-floor/incontinence functionality and the broader role of biofeedback/electrical stimulation in male continence rehabilitation.
Can the rectal probe be used immediately after HoLEP?
Do not assume so.
Internal probe use requires clearance from the operating urologist and a trained pelvic-health clinician.
Can the patient use EMG Pro at home?
Potentially.
The device includes Patient Mode for clinician-directed carryover, but it is an Rx-only system and should first be programmed and taught by a qualified professional.
Is biofeedback better than electrical stimulation?
They serve different purposes.
Biofeedback measures and teaches voluntary activation.
NMES produces or assists contraction.
ETS links the patient's voluntary effort to stimulation.
The clinician may use one or combine them depending on the patient's impairment.
Does every man after HoLEP need EMG Pro?
No.
Many patients may recover with properly taught pelvic-floor exercises and time.
EMG Pro is most relevant when objective feedback, motor retraining, or electrical assistance would add value.
Does urinary leakage after HoLEP always mean weak pelvic-floor muscles?
No.
Leakage can involve sphincter weakness, coordination, urgency, bladder dysfunction, or other postoperative factors.
Persistent or unusual symptoms require urologic assessment.
Bottom Line: Richmar EMG Pro Is the Better Recommendation for Specialized Post-HoLEP Pelvic-Floor Re-Education
For this specific clinical question, the Richmar EMG Pro with probes is a better recommendation than the Balego BAL805.
Not because BAL805 is an inadequate NMES device—it is a capable general surface-muscle stimulator.
The difference is that EMG Pro is built around the specialized tasks involved in pelvic-floor rehabilitation:
Measure the contraction.
Show the patient the contraction.
teach better voluntary recruitment
measure relaxation
set training thresholds
trigger stimulation from voluntary effort
Provide NMES when appropriate.
support a rectal pelvic-floor probe
Use dedicated incontinence programs.
Richmar specifically positions the system for urinary incontinence and pelvic-floor health and provides a rectal-probe configuration for clinician-directed treatment.
At the same time, the evidence should remain accurately framed:
Pelvic-floor muscle training has direct evidence after HoLEP. EMG biofeedback and electrical stimulation are reasonable professional adjuncts when clinically indicated, but EMG Pro has not itself been proven in a HoLEP-specific randomized trial.
That makes the appropriate treatment pathway:
1. Postoperative urologic clearance
2. Pelvic-floor assessment by a trained clinician
3. Correct voluntary pelvic-floor muscle training
4. Add EMG biofeedback when awareness, technique, or progression needs objective feedback.
5. Add ETS or NMES when clinically appropriate.
6. Use the rectal probe only when properly screened, prescribed, and instructed.
For the recommended professional system:
Richmar EMG Pro—EMG Biofeedback, ETS, NMES & TENS at Balego
For a deeper explanation of pelvic-floor EMG:
Pelvic Floor EMG Biofeedback: Evidence & EMG Pro Guide
For general surface-muscle NMES rather than pelvic-floor-specific rehabilitation:
Balego EMS Digital NMES Stimulator BAL805
For additional neuromuscular stimulation equipment:
Balego Neuromuscular Stimulation Collection
Medical & Product-Use Notice
HoLEP is a surgical procedure, and urinary leakage after surgery can have multiple causes. Richmar EMG Pro is an Rx-only rehabilitation device. Postoperative timing, pelvic-floor assessment, rectal-probe use, EMG thresholds, stimulation parameters, and home treatment should be established by the operating urologist and appropriately trained pelvic-health clinician. The presence of pelvic-floor or incontinence protocols does not mean every patient or every form of postoperative urinary leakage is appropriate for electrical stimulation.
